Is There Any Privacy in Media?

The answer to this question is simple, there is not. The mass media does not know what privacy is. For example consider the situation, that someone in front of you just fell in to the dog's poo, and the person beside you had it all filmed on his iPhone (I am an Apple addict, so most of the examples would be considering Apple). Immediately after filming it, he can stream it on YouTube and millions of people can watch this unfortunate person fell into dog's poo and then discuss him. This person is most likely going to become the joke target of his friends, which might lead him to committing suicide, which happened already and not once. With a single small device you are able to kill a person mentally in only a seconds, by distributing this video to various media. Internet, Television and press are the most privacy decreasing medias of all. As far as the Internet goes, you are able to get information about anything, also there are information that are included in TV and Press, so basically Internet has it all. But this topic is not that much about private information, because people willingly put their information on their Internet capable devices, basically they have choice whether they are going to put them or not and of course in todays society people know that there are certain crimes done through Internet, so they are willingly exposing themselves to these crimes, just waiting for someone to find them and get their name, address, bank accounts, private pictures, sex tapes, and many other stuff that one finds valuable and all this is done through Internet by hacking to your phone. This is also the case of social networks, where people want to share their information with their friends, but actually because the system is not bullet-proof, your personal information can be seen by people that are not your friends. My point is that it is more about the public humiliation, the essence of being exposed to public via media, without knowing that you have been photographed or recorded previously. Of course one can argue that when there are victims of certain crimes and there faces are exposed it more about the information than the public humiliation, because these people already are victims of a crime so people tend to feel sorry about them, therefore the person would not be humiliated because everyone laughs at him, but, on the other hand this person might get overwhelmed by the sudden sympathy around him and caused by other people, this person also might become a victim again when the followers of the attacker would seek revenge. So we can conclude that both imaging someone in a humiliating way and as a victim, without them wanting to will lead to decrease in their privacy and might have various consequences, as one old saying says: "There are always two ends of a story, one bad and one happy." It is true that media exposure can bring you your five minutes of fame, but then be aware of papparazzi (see my other postings). Today we live in the world of never-ending technology development so, however the technology, especially the one that is done for communication is not bullet-proof and there are bugs that should be destroyed so one's privacy would not be compromised.